#Em client support exchange download
"I don't want it to auto download these images because it's using up my data".
If you do reach out and they don't seem to be going for the 'security angle' try the 'data angle'. If there isn't you might try reaching out to the devs and suggest the ability to do so. Tldr Probably not but if it bothers you check your settings, maybe there's one to turn off this default behavior. I looked at the site, found the same post you pasted here and I can't seem to find any more detail than that on the 'or more'. But I digress.)įor someone to pull off this sort of thing with a domain icon would probably require a unique domain for each message.doable but not likely.Īs for the 'or more', nobody can really answer that without knowing what the 'or more' is. Generate random email address, attempt to download Gravatar, if successful email address is (more likely to be) legit. (Though now that I think about it Gravatar itself might make an interesting vector for confirming email addresses. If you have configured your server to only support. Net 4.5 (where TLS v1.1 and TLS v1.2 support was added), it cannot use these versions. This appears due to its core communication libraries targetting. Even assuming the user does have access to that data (which I seriously doubt) I can't think of any way that by itself could be used to correlate a users email. So, if your BlueEmail support your email, you don’t need to always switch to different email. eM Client supports communicating with a server over TLS v1.0 but not TLS v1.1 or TLS v1.2. I don't know what kind of tracking data Gravatar may make available to it's users but I imagine at best (worst?) it would contain the IP addresses of where it was downloaded from. I haven't used Gravatar before but from what I'm seeing it looks more like a many-to-one relation (many users downloading one image). If the image gets downloaded later then you know they opened the message.
For example a tried and true tactic is to embed a link to a 1 pixel image with a unique name/url in a message.
This sort of tactic usually requires a 'unique' resource. I realize that's not a great answer in itself so here's a breakdown of my thought process.
0 kommentar(er)
